The crown attorney withdrew the case as a result of submissions of the lawyer, in a dangerous driving charge there must be more than just an accident to prove the accused was driving dangerously.
Must Prove Intent to Drive Dangerously
Dangerous driving is more than an error in driving, there must be intent, high speed is not enough to be convicted of dangerous driving.
Must be More than Just an Accident.
On Saturday June 1, 2013 at 10:53am a police officer was doing radar enforcement on Highway 400. The officer observed a jeep motor vehicle traveling at a high rate of speed and activated his radar unit within the police car. The officer obtained a speed of 150 km/h in the posted 100 km/h zone.
The officer pursued the vehicle, and tried to stop it by activating the emergency lights and siren on the police car. Despite being directly behind the vehicle, the vehicle failed to pull over for the officer.
The officer moved into the left lane and accelerated to the point he was parallel with the speeding vehicle. The vehicle continued, and increased it’s speed to 160km/h.
Not until the officer got slightly ahead and beside the vehicle did the female driver notice the police car. The officer then motioned with his hand for the driver to pull to the side of the road. The officer then slowed down and moved behind the Jeep.
As the Jeep started to slow down it drove off the road and into a 4 x 4 post. The vehicle came to a stop after hitting a large galvanized warning barrel head-on and came to a stop.
The officer ran up to the vehicle to see if the driver or any passengers were hurt. The lone female driver was not hurt. The officer spoke to the woman and determined that she had not consumed alcohol and did not appear to be under the influence of any drugs.
The officer believed the driver had committed the offence of Dangerous Driving contrary to the Criminal Code of Canada . The officer charged the woman and released her on a promise to appear in court.
The accused retained the services of criminal law firm Charitsis Law in Toronto.
In the course of the case, Nicholas Charitsis reviewed the case law and jurisprudence relating the charge of dangerous driving. Mr. Charitsis presented the case law stating that speed alone is not conclusive of the mens rea and actus reas of dangerous driving to the Crown Attorney’s office.
The Crown Attorney responded that the court could consider the driving beyond just the speed of the Jeep, but also the actions of the driver when the police officer activated his emergency lights to tried to get the Jeep to stop.
In particular, the Crown Attorney argued that the driver failed to stop for the police officer and by continuing to drive in the manner she did, that the driver put other drivers on the highway at risk, thereby the offence of Dangerous Driving could be made out a trial.
Charitsis presented the defence by submitting that his client was driving on Highway 400 and had been in the left-hand passing lane; while proceeding to change lanes to the right-hand “slower” lane. She was solely focused on the ride hand side of her vehicle when she was suddenly startled by the presence of a police cruiser with its red lights on that was immediately to her left.
At no point in time prior to this moment did she see the police officer’s vehicle, nor did she hear the police siren as her radio was on.
When she saw the police car, she immediately panicked, and it was her first instinct to stop and pull over. In her panic she abruptly slammed on her brakes and pulled off to the right shoulder, keeping her eyes on the police officer’s vehicle the whole time. Thus due to her inattention, she ended up striking the 4 x 4 post.
It was never her intention to flee from the police, but rather she was suddenly startled, (the accused was described as an inexperienced driver).
As a result, Charitsis argued that this was not driving that was a marked departure from the reasonable standard in this particular case, and was not Dangerous Driving. These arguments presented by defence lawyer Nicholas Charitsis, resulted in the Crown Attorneys office using its prosecutorial discretion not to proceed with the Criminal charge of dangerous driving and the charge was withdrawn.
Experienced Criminal Defence
You’re not guilty unless a judge says you are, not the police or the crown attorney.
It’s your right as a Canadian citizen to be properly defended in court and to have the evidence of your accuser challenged by a criminal lawyer.
As a criminal defence lawyer I have years of experience helping people accused of criminal charges and I can help you.
Together with my network of legal professionals we have been able to help thousands of people looking to do everything possible to win and be properly represented in criminal court.
Knowing the court system, the crown attorney’s, police and judges and having them know you can have dramatic implications. Experience does count in criminal defence. We know how to fight for our clients and present compelling and aggressive defence arguments.
Call 416-731-7113 to discuss your criminal defence today.
Send me an Email
This site is for information only and is not meant to replace qualified legal advice by a criminal defence lawyer. The application and interpretation of law, impaired driving, DUI and drinking and driving, is constantly changing, the writers shall not be held responsible for any information that may be incorrect or out of date. The owners of this website recommend that anyone wishing to fight a criminal charge obtain qualified legal advice before doing so.