Legal Definitions
Legal terms used in criminal law: Definitions and legal explanations.
Speak With a Criminal Defence Lawyer
- A -
Absolute Discharge
An “Absolute Discharge” is a legal outcome in criminal defence law where an individual, despite being found guilty or having pled guilty, is not given a formal sentence by the judge. This decision results in the individual not carrying a criminal record post-verdict. It’s a significant concept in criminal law, emphasizing rehabilitation and the acknowledgment that not all guilty verdicts necessitate punitive measures.
Accused
The term “Accused” is used to describe an individual who is being formally charged or suspected of committing a crime. This designation plays a critical role in the criminal justice system, marking the beginning of the individual’s journey through legal proceedings. The rights and legal representation of the accused are of paramount importance in ensuring a fair trial and upholding the principles of justice.
Access Period
The “Access Period” refers to a specific duration within youth criminal justice proceedings, during which a youth’s criminal record remains unsealed and accessible. This period is crucial for understanding the implications of youth offences and the protection of their future prospects. It highlights the balance between accountability and the potential for rehabilitation and reintegration into society.
Accusation
An “Accusation” in the realm of criminal law signifies a formal declaration that an individual is alleged to have engaged in criminal activity. This preliminary step in the legal process is foundational for the pursuit of justice, setting the stage for further investigation and potential legal proceedings. It underscores the legal principle that individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Acquittal
An “Acquittal” occurs when a court concludes that there is insufficient evidence to convict the accused of the crime charged, resulting in their release from the accusation. This verdict is a cornerstone of criminal defence, reinforcing the burden of proof on the prosecution and the right to a fair trial. It underscores the presumption of innocence that is fundamental to the legal systems in democratic societies.
Adjournment
An “Adjournment” in legal proceedings refers to the temporary halt or postponement of court proceedings, allowing for further preparation, consideration of new information, or scheduling conveniences. This procedural aspect is crucial for ensuring that all parties have adequate time to present their case fully and fairly, reflecting the justice system’s adaptability and commitment to thoroughness.
Allegation
An “Allegation” is a claim or assertion that someone has committed an offence or wrongdoing, pending verification or proof. In the context of criminal law, allegations initiate the investigative and legal processes, underscoring the importance of evidence and the right to a fair hearing. They are pivotal in maintaining the balance between protecting society and safeguarding the rights of individuals accused of crimes.
Appeals
“Appeals” in criminal law refer to the process whereby either the defence or prosecution requests a higher court to review the decision of a lower court, arguing that a significant error impacted the verdict. This procedural right is fundamental to the justice system, ensuring that legal decisions are subject to scrutiny and that the principles of fairness and accuracy in legal proceedings are upheld.
Appearance Notice
An “Appearance Notice” is an official document issued to an accused person, mandating their presence in court to respond to criminal charges. This notice plays a critical role in the legal process, ensuring that individuals are formally informed of and respond to allegations against them. Failure to comply can result in further legal consequences, emphasizing the importance of adherence to judicial procedures.
Approved Instruments
Approved instruments are breath testing devices that have been officially authorized under the Criminal Code of Canada for use in impaired driving investigations. These devices, commonly used at the police station, are relied on to measure a person’s blood alcohol concentration (BAC). To be valid in court, the tests must be conducted using an approved instrument that is properly maintained, calibrated, and operated according to strict legal procedures. If there are issues with how the device was used, maintained, or tested, the accuracy of the results may be challenged as part of a defence strategy.
Arraignment
An “Arraignment” is a pivotal court hearing where the accused, through their defence counsel, declares their plea in response to criminal charges. This procedural step determines the course of legal proceedings, setting the stage for a trial or sentencing based on the plea. It underscores the accused’s right to a fair trial and the judiciary’s role in administering justice efficiently and equitably.
- B -
Bail Hearing
A “Bail Hearing” is a critical judicial procedure where a judge assesses whether an accused individual should be granted freedom from custody pending their trial or appeal. This process, also known as a show cause or judicial interim release hearing, is a fundamental aspect of criminal law, emphasizing the balance between the accused’s rights and the interests of public safety. The decision hinges on various factors, including the nature of the alleged crime, the accused’s ties to the community, and the likelihood of attending future court dates.
Bail Conditions
Bail conditions are the rules a person must follow after being released from custody while their criminal charge is still before the court. In Canada, a judge or justice of the peace sets these conditions to manage risk and ensure the accused returns to court. Common bail conditions may include reporting to a police station, obeying a curfew, staying away from certain people or places, not possessing weapons, or avoiding drugs and alcohol. These conditions are legally binding, and breaching them can lead to new criminal charges, detention, and a more difficult position in court moving forward.
Bail Variation
A bail variation is a formal request to change one or more of the conditions of your release while your criminal charge is still before the court. In Ontario, this usually requires the consent of the Crown Attorney, or if consent is not given, a hearing before a judge to decide whether the changes are appropriate. A bail variation may be needed if your circumstances have changed, such as for work, family responsibilities, or travel, or if a condition is too strict or no longer necessary. The court will only approve a variation if it is satisfied that the new terms still address public safety, ensure you attend court, and maintain confidence in the justice system.
Blood alcohol concentration (BAC)
Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is the amount of alcohol in a person’s blood, measured as a percentage, and it is the key number used in breathalyzer testing across Canada. For example, a BAC of 0.08 means there are 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood. When police use a roadside or station breathalyzer, the device estimates BAC by measuring alcohol in your breath and converting it into a blood reading. This number is critical because it determines whether a driver is over the legal limit, which can lead to criminal charges, licence suspensions, fines, and other serious penalties.
Bail
“Bail” represents a court’s decision to release an accused from custody under specific conditions while awaiting trial. This legal mechanism ensures that the accused can maintain their daily life outside of detention, provided they comply with set rules and appear in court as required. The conditions of bail may involve financial commitments, such as a cash deposit or a surety agreement, to incentivize compliance and return to court. Bail plays a pivotal role in the criminal justice system, balancing the presumption of innocence with the need to ensure judicial proceedings are respected.
Bereaved / Bereavement
The terms “Bereaved” and “Bereavement” refer to the state of sorrow and grief experienced following the death of a loved one. This emotional process is universally recognized and respected, acknowledging the profound impact of loss on individuals. The bereavement period is marked by a range of emotions and adjustments as individuals navigate their way through the loss. Recognizing and supporting the bereaved is crucial in fostering empathy and compassion within communities and societal structures.
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
“Beyond a Reasonable Doubt” is a legal standard of proof required in criminal trials to secure a conviction. This standard demands that the judge or jury be firmly convinced of the accused’s guilt, leaving no room for reasonable hesitation. It is the highest standard of proof, reflecting the seriousness of criminal charges and the potential consequences of a conviction. Upholding this standard safeguards the principle of innocence until proven guilty, ensuring that only those truly culpable face the penalties associated with criminal behavior.
Breathalyzer
A breathalyzer is a device used by police to measure the amount of alcohol in a person’s breath in order to estimate their blood alcohol concentration (BAC). In Canada, evidentiary breath tests are conducted at the police station using approved instruments authorized under the Criminal Code. These devices must be properly maintained, calibrated, and operated according to strict procedures for the results to be reliable in court. The readings from an approved instrument are often a central part of the Crown’s evidence in impaired driving cases.
Breath Demand
A breath demand is a legal order made by a police officer under the Criminal Code of Canada requiring a driver to provide a sample of their breath to test for alcohol. This demand can happen at the roadside using an approved screening device, or later at the police station using a more precise instrument. The officer must have legal grounds to make the demand, such as observing signs of alcohol use or conducting a lawful roadside screening. If the test shows alcohol in your system, it can be used as evidence in court. However, refusing or failing to provide a breath sample without a valid reason is a separate criminal offence, and it often carries the same or even more serious penalties than an impaired driving charge.
Breath Test Records
Breath test records in Canadian criminal law are the official documents created when police use an approved screening device or an approved instrument to measure a driver’s blood alcohol level. These records usually include the test results, the time each sample was taken, the identity of the officer operating the device, and information showing the machine was working properly. In impaired driving cases, the Crown relies on these records as key evidence to prove alcohol concentration over the legal limit. However, the defence will closely review them for accuracy and compliance with the law, including whether the tests were taken within required time limits and whether proper procedures were followed. As a result, breath test records often play a central role in determining whether the evidence is reliable and whether the charge can be challenged at trial.
- C -
Challenge
A “Challenge” in the context of criminal law refers to a formal objection raised against a juror’s participation in a trial. This procedural safeguard allows either the defence or the prosecution to contest the suitability of a juror, ensuring the impartiality and fairness of the jury. Challenges are critical in upholding the integrity of the judicial process, ensuring that jurors can objectively assess the evidence and render a just verdict.
Character Evidence
“Character Evidence” pertains to the assessment of an individual’s personality, ethics, traits, and overall character. In criminal proceedings, such evidence can be pivotal, offering insights into the accused’s behavior patterns and moral compass. However, its admissibility is carefully regulated to ensure that judgments are based on facts relevant to the case at hand, rather than prejudicial assumptions about character.
Charged
Being “Charged” denotes the formal accusation of an individual with a criminal offence, initiated by Crown counsel. This crucial step in the criminal justice process signifies the commencement of legal proceedings against the accused, based on evidence suggesting their involvement in a criminal act. The charging process underscores the rule of law and the commitment to prosecuting alleged criminal behaviors through due process.
Charges
“Charges” refer to the specific criminal offences an individual is accused of committing. The formal laying of charges by Crown counsel marks a significant phase in the criminal justice process, transitioning an individual from a suspect to an accused. This legal action initiates the procedural steps necessary for adjudicating the accused’s guilt or innocence in a court of law.
Charter Issues
Charter issues in criminal law refer to situations where police or investigators may have violated a person’s rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. These rights include protections against unlawful search and seizure, arbitrary detention, and the right to speak with a lawyer without delay. For example, if police stop someone without proper grounds, conduct an unlawful search, or delay access to counsel after an arrest, this may raise a Charter issue. In many cases, a criminal defence lawyer will review the evidence closely to determine whether any rights were breached. If a violation is found, the court may exclude key evidence, which can significantly weaken the Crown’s case and, in some situations, lead to the charges being withdrawn or dismissed.
Conditions
“Conditions” refer to specific terms or rules imposed on an individual when they are released into the community by a court or during any stage of the criminal process. These conditions are designed to ensure compliance with the law, protect public safety, and facilitate the individual’s rehabilitation and responsible reintegration into society.
Conditional Discharge
A “Conditional Discharge” occurs when an individual found guilty of an offence is not formally convicted, provided they meet certain conditions. This judicial decision allows for the avoidance of a criminal record upon successful completion of the specified terms, reflecting a focus on rehabilitation and the potential for the accused to make amends and reintegrate into society positively.
Consensual
“Consensual” refers to situations or actions agreed upon by all parties involved. In legal contexts, particularly concerning matters of consent, this term underscores the importance of voluntary and informed agreement, ensuring that all parties are fully aware of and agree to the terms or actions proposed.
Consent
“Consent” involves giving permission for something to happen or agreeing to participate in an activity. In legal terms, consent must be informed, voluntary, and given without coercion, playing a crucial role in various areas of law, especially in matters related to personal autonomy and rights.
Convict / Convicted / Conviction(s) / Convicting
The terms “Convict,” “Convicted,” “Conviction,” and “Convicting” relate to the process and outcome of proving an accused’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. A conviction signifies the legal determination that an individual has committed the crime they were charged with, leading to the imposition of a sentence. This fundamental aspect of criminal law underscores the rigorous standards and processes required to establish guilt.
Court Proceedings
“Court Proceedings” encompass the series of legal steps and activities conducted in a courtroom as part of a criminal case. These proceedings are the mechanism through which legal disputes are adjudicated, involving the presentation of evidence, examination of witnesses, and application of legal principles to resolve the matter at hand.
Credibility Evidence
“Credibility Evidence” concerns the assessment of a witness’s honesty and reliability in providing testimony. The credibility of a witness is crucial in determining the weight and influence of their testimony on the case’s outcome, highlighting the importance of truthfulness and reliability in the judicial process.
Cross-examination
Cross-examination in Canadian law is the stage of a trial where the opposing lawyer questions a witness who has already testified, usually to test the accuracy, reliability, and truth of their evidence. In a criminal case, after the Crown Attorney leads a witness, the defence has the right to cross-examine that witness to explore inconsistencies, challenge memory, reveal bias, or highlight gaps in the evidence. This process is a key part of the court process because it helps the judge assess credibility and determine whether the Crown has proven the case beyond a reasonable doubt. Effective cross-examination can expose weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and, in some situations, create reasonable doubt that leads to an acquittal.
Criminal Charge
A “Criminal Charge” is the formal accusation made against an individual, alleging their commission of a specific criminal offence. This step, undertaken by Crown counsel, signifies the initiation of legal proceedings, moving the accused into the judicial system to face the allegations. The charging process is a fundamental aspect of criminal law, embodying the state’s response to alleged criminal behavior.
Criminal Code / Criminal Code of Canada
The “Criminal Code of Canada” is the comprehensive federal statute that outlines criminal offences, procedures for prosecution, and sentences in Canada. It serves as the legal foundation for criminal law across the country, ensuring a uniform approach to the definition and handling of crimes. The Code is instrumental in maintaining public order and justice by clearly specifying legal boundaries and penalties.
Cross-Examination
“Cross-Examination” is a critical phase in a trial where a witness is questioned by the opposing side’s lawyer, following their initial examination. This process aims to test the credibility and reliability of the witness’s testimony, challenging their account and uncovering the truth. Effective cross-examination can significantly influence the outcome of a case.
Crown Attorney
“Crown Attorney,” also known as Crown prosecutors or Crown counsel, are independent legal professionals who represent the state in prosecuting criminal cases. They play a crucial role in the justice system, working on behalf of the public interest to ensure that justice is served. Their responsibilities include deciding on charges, conducting prosecutions, and recommending sentences, guided by legal and ethical standards.
Custody / In Custody / Custodial
Being “In Custody” refers to the state of being detained by law enforcement or correctional authorities, whether in a police station, correctional centre, or youth custody facility. This term encompasses both pre-trial detention and post-conviction incarceration, reflecting the state’s authority to restrict freedom as part of the criminal justice process.
- D -
Defence Counsel
Defence Counsel” refers to the lawyer or team of lawyers tasked with representing an individual accused or charged with a criminal offence. This legal representation is pivotal in ensuring the accused’s rights are protected throughout the judicial process. Defence counsel plays a critical role in the adversarial system, providing essential legal advice, formulating a defence strategy, and advocating on behalf of the accused to achieve the best possible outcome.
Defendant
The term “Defendant” is used within the courtroom to describe a person formally accused of a crime following the laying of charges by Crown counsel. Synonymous with the accused, the defendant’s rights and responsibilities are central to the criminal justice process, ensuring they are given a fair opportunity to contest the charges against them and present their case.
Direct Examination
“Direct Examination” involves the questioning of a witness by the lawyer who has called them to testify in court. This phase of the trial is designed to elicit factual information through open-ended questions, allowing the witness to provide their account without the questioning suggesting specific answers. Direct examination is fundamental for building a case by presenting evidence and establishing facts.
Discharge
A “Discharge” occurs when an individual, despite being found guilty or pleading guilty, is not convicted by the judge, sparing them from a criminal record. This outcome, which can be absolute or conditional, reflects a judicial discretion aimed at rehabilitation and recognizing circumstances where the standard consequences of a conviction may not be in the interests of justice or the individual’s rehabilitation.
Disclosure
“Disclosure” is the process by which the Crown shares all relevant evidence and information about the case with the defence. This principle ensures transparency and fairness in the criminal justice process, enabling the accused to fully understand the case against them and prepare an adequate defence. Disclosure is a cornerstone of legal rights, ensuring both parties have access to the necessary information for a fair trial.
Dismiss
To “Dismiss” a case means for a court to reject it, removing it from consideration. This action can occur for various reasons, including insufficient evidence, procedural issues, or if pursuing the case is deemed not in the public interest. Dismissal upholds the principle that legal actions should only proceed when justified by the facts and legal standards.
Duty Counsel
“Duty Counsel” are lawyers available to provide immediate legal assistance for free at initial court appearances and bail hearings. Although typically not available for trial representation, duty counsel plays a crucial role in the legal system by offering advice, ensuring individuals understand their rights, and assisting with procedural matters during the early stages of the criminal process.
- E -
- F -
Failure to Appear
“Failure to Appear” is a legal offence occurring when an individual does not show up for a scheduled court date. This failure can lead to further legal consequences, including additional charges, highlighting the importance of compliance with court orders and schedules in the judicial process.
First Appearance
The “First Appearance” is the initial court date for an accused individual, marking the beginning of the formal legal process. This appearance sets the stage for subsequent legal proceedings, including hearings, trials, or plea negotiations.
- G -
Guilty
Being “Guilty” means that an individual has either admitted to committing a crime (pleaded guilty) or has been found by a judge or jury to have committed the crime they were charged with. This determination is central to the criminal justice process, leading to sentencing and the imposition of penalties as prescribed by law.
- H -
Hearing
A “Hearing” provides individuals with an opportunity to present their case or arguments before a judge in court. It is a critical component of the legal process, allowing for the examination of evidence, legal arguments, and decisions on various procedural and substantive issues.
- I -
Indictable Offences
“Indictable Offences” represent more serious crimes within the criminal justice system, such as theft over $5,000, break and enter, aggravated sexual assault, and murder. These offences carry heavier penalties, including the possibility of life imprisonment, and some have mandatory minimum sentences.
Indictment
An “Indictment” is a formal document listing the charges against a defendant in serious criminal cases. It signifies the commencement of criminal proceedings for indictable offences, outlining the specific accusations that the accused is required to answer to in court.
- J -
Judge
A “Judge” is the official tasked with overseeing court proceedings, making decisions on legal questions, and, in bench trials, determining the guilt or innocence of the accused. Judges play a pivotal role in the administration of justice, ensuring that trials are conducted fairly and in accordance with the law.
Judgment
“Judgment” refers to the decision made by a judge or jury regarding the guilt or innocence of a defendant in a criminal case. This verdict is the culmination of the trial process, determining the legal outcome for the accused based on the evidence presented.
Judicial Stay of Proceedings
A “Judicial Stay of Proceedings” occurs when a judge halts the court process before the trial concludes, effectively suspending further legal action. This rare decision may be made for various legal or procedural reasons, leaving the charges unresolved.
Justice of The Peace
A “Justice of the Peace” is a court officer endowed with certain judicial powers. While their authority may be more limited than that of judges, Justices of the Peace play an essential role in the legal system, handling minor offences, preliminary matters, and various administrative duties.
- L -
Lawful Authority
Lawful authority in criminal law refers to the legal power given to police or other officials to take certain actions, such as stopping a person, conducting a search, making a demand, or placing someone under arrest. In Canada, these powers come from statutes like the Criminal Code of Canada, provincial laws, or established legal rules developed by the courts. For example, an officer must have lawful authority to detain a driver or demand a breath sample. If that authority is missing or improperly used, the action may be unlawful. In many cases, a criminal defence lawyer will review whether the police acted within their lawful authority, because if they did not, it may lead to a Charter challenge and the exclusion of key evidence, which can significantly weaken the Crown’s case.
Legal arguments
Legal arguments in Canadian criminal law are the structured reasons a defence lawyer or the Crown presents to persuade the court to accept their position on the case. These arguments are based on the evidence, the applicable law, and how the court process was handled. For example, a defence strategy may challenge whether the evidence proves the charge beyond a reasonable doubt, whether the police followed proper procedures, or whether a person’s Charter rights were breached. In response, the Crown Attorney will argue that the evidence is reliable and meets the legal test required for a conviction. As a result, legal arguments shape how a judge evaluates the facts, applies the law, and ultimately decides whether the charge is proven or should be dismissed.
Legal presumption
A legal presumption is a rule that allows a court to accept a fact as true without direct proof, based on another established fact. Once the initial fact is proven, the law assumes the second fact unless it is challenged. Some presumptions can be rebutted with evidence to the contrary, while others are mandatory unless specific legal conditions are met. In criminal cases, presumptions can affect how evidence is considered, but they must still operate within the requirement that guilt be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Legal grounds
Legal grounds are the factual and legal basis required to justify a decision or action under the law. In criminal cases, this often refers to the specific facts that give police the lawful authority to act, such as stopping a vehicle, making a demand, conducting a search, or making an arrest. These grounds must be objectively reasonable and supported by evidence, not just a suspicion or assumption. If proper legal grounds are missing, the action may be challenged in court and the evidence obtained could be excluded.
Legal Rights
Legal rights in criminal law in Canada are the protections every person has when they are investigated, arrested, or charged with a criminal offence. These rights come mainly from the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and are designed to ensure fairness in the court process. For example, you have the right to remain silent, the right to speak with a criminal defence lawyer without delay, the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and the right to a fair trial. In addition, police must follow strict rules when collecting evidence, and any breach of your rights can sometimes lead to that evidence being excluded in court. As a result, understanding your legal rights early can make a significant difference in how your case is handled and may impact the outcome of your charges.
- M -
Marked Departure
A marked departure is a legal standard used in Canadian criminal law, especially in dangerous driving cases, to describe conduct that represents a significant and clear deviation from how a reasonable person would have driven in the same circumstances. It is more than a simple mistake or momentary lapse. Instead, it involves a serious disregard for the safety of others. To secure a conviction, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused’s driving was a marked departure from the expected standard of care.
Mistrial
A “Mistrial” occurs when a trial is invalidated due to a significant error or issue that prevents a conclusion on the merits of the case, such as a hung jury or procedural mistake. This situation necessitates a retrial or other legal resolution to address the charges initially brought to court.
- N -
Non-consensual
“Non-consensual” refers to actions or activities that occur without the agreement or consent of all parties involved. In legal contexts, particularly in cases of sexual assault or harassment, the distinction between consensual and non-consensual interactions is critical for determining the legality and ethicality of the behavior.
No Contact
A “No Contact” order is a legal directive issued by a court prohibiting the accused or convicted individual from communicating with a specified person. This order is often employed in cases involving domestic violence, harassment, or stalking to protect victims from further harm.
Non-disclosure
“Non-disclosure” occurs when information is not made known or shared, especially in contexts where transparency or sharing of information is expected or legally required. It can involve withholding details that might be crucial for decision-making, compliance, or accountability.
- O -
- P -
Peace Bond
A “Peace Bond” is a court order that aims to prevent potential harm by imposing specific conditions on an individual’s behavior towards another person. Obtained through a criminal court process, it serves as a preventive measure to protect individuals from threats or harm by mandating behavioral restrictions on the subject of the order.
Perjury
“Perjury” involves making false statements under oath or affirmation in a legal proceeding. This serious offence undermines the integrity of the justice system by obstructing the truth, and it carries significant legal penalties to deter dishonesty in court.
Plea / Plead / Pleading
The “Plea” is the response an accused person gives to the court regarding their guilt or innocence concerning the charges against them. This legal declaration is a critical step in the criminal justice process, determining the course of subsequent proceedings.
Preliminary Hearing
A preliminary hearing is a court step used in more serious criminal cases to decide whether there is enough evidence to proceed to trial. It takes place in the Ontario Court of Justice before a judge. During the hearing, the Crown Attorney presents key evidence and witnesses, and the defence can question them. The judge does not decide guilt or innocence. Instead, the judge decides whether the evidence could support a conviction at trial. If there is enough evidence, the case is committed to trial. If not, the charge may be dismissed at that stage.
Pre-Trial
A pretrial is a meeting in the court process where your defence and the Crown Attorney review the case before a trial is scheduled. It usually takes place in the Ontario Court of Justice and focuses on discussing the evidence, identifying the legal issues, and exploring whether the case can be resolved without a trial. For example, the Crown may point out weaknesses in the case, or your defence may raise problems with the evidence or how it was obtained. In many cases, this is where opportunities arise to have charges withdrawn, reduced, or clarified. As a result, a pretrial is an important step because it helps both sides understand the strengths and risks of the case before deciding how to move forward.
Promise to Appear
A “Promise to Appear” is a legal commitment made by an accused individual, signifying their agreement to attend court on a specified date. This document is typically issued upon release from police custody before trial, serving as a crucial component in ensuring the accused’s participation in forthcoming legal proceedings.
Probation
Probation in Canadian criminal law is a court-ordered sentence that allows a person to remain in the community under strict conditions instead of going to jail or after being released. It is governed by the Criminal Code of Canada and is meant to promote rehabilitation while protecting the public. During a probation order, the individual must follow specific rules set by the court, such as reporting to a probation officer, keeping the peace, attending counselling, avoiding certain people or places, or not possessing alcohol or drugs. If any of these conditions are breached, the person can face new criminal charges, which may lead to further penalties, including possible jail time.
- R -
Reasonable & Probable Grounds
Reasonable and probable grounds is a legal standard in Canadian criminal law that allows police to take serious steps, such as making an arrest or conducting a search, when there is a clear and objective basis to believe an offence has been committed. It requires more than a suspicion or hunch, but less than proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and is based on what a reasonable person would conclude from the facts known at the time. Courts assess whether the officer relied on credible information and whether those facts logically point to a crime; for example, in an impaired driving case, signs like the smell of alcohol, slurred speech, poor driving, and a failed roadside test may combine to form reasonable and probable grounds. If this standard is not met, the defence can challenge the police action and seek to have key evidence excluded, which can significantly affect the outcome of the case.
Reasonable Doubt
Reasonable doubt is the legal standard the Crown must meet to prove a criminal charge in Canada. It means the judge or jury must be sure of the accused’s guilt based on the evidence, not just think it is likely or probable. A reasonable doubt is a real and sensible doubt that arises from the evidence or from a lack of evidence, not a vague or imaginary concern. If, after considering all the evidence, there remains a reasonable doubt about any essential part of the case, the court must find the accused not guilty.
Reasonable Excuse
A reasonable excuse in criminal law refers to a legitimate explanation for conduct that would otherwise be considered an offence, if the circumstances show the person acted in a way that a reasonable person might accept in that situation. In Canada, courts assess a reasonable excuse based on the specific facts, including what the person knew at the time and whether their actions were proportionate to the situation. For example, a reasonable excuse may arise where someone acted to prevent harm, responded to an emergency, or had no realistic alternative. The Crown must prove the offence beyond a reasonable doubt, and if there is evidence supporting a reasonable excuse, it can raise a doubt about whether the person is legally responsible. A criminal defence lawyer will review the evidence carefully to determine whether a reasonable excuse applies and how it may be used as part of a defence strategy.
Recanting Witness
A recanting witness is a person who originally gave a statement or testimony about an incident, but later changes their version of events or says their earlier statement was not true. In criminal cases, this often happens when a witness tells police one story and then, before or during court, tries to withdraw or contradict that statement. However, the original statement does not simply disappear. The Crown Attorney may still rely on it as evidence, and the court will closely examine why the witness changed their story, including whether there was pressure, fear, or credibility issues.
Remand
A remand in criminal law means your case is put over to another court date without a final decision being made. In Ontario courts, this usually happens to allow time for the Crown to provide disclosure, for your criminal defence lawyer to review the evidence, or to discuss possible resolution. You may be released on bail during this time, or remain in custody if bail has not been granted. Remands are a normal part of the court process and give you and your lawyer time to properly prepare your defence before moving forward.
Reverse Onus
A reverse onus bail hearing means the accused must show the court why they should be released from custody. In most bail hearings, the Crown must show why the accused should remain in jail. However, for certain criminal charges or situations, the law shifts the burden to the accused to demonstrate why release is appropriate.- S -
Sentence / Sentencing / Sentenced
The “Sentence” is the penalty imposed on an individual who has been convicted of a crime, following their plea of guilt or a guilty verdict. This punishment can range from fines and community service to probation and incarceration, tailored to the nature of the offence and the circumstances surrounding it.
Sentence Hearing
A “Sentence Hearing” is a judicial proceeding where the court, specifically the judge, considers arguments and evidence from both the prosecution and defence regarding the appropriate sentence for a convicted individual. This process ensures a fair and proportionate penalty, considering all relevant factors.
Sexual Assault
“Sexual Assault” involves any non-consensual sexual contact, encompassing a wide range of unwanted sexual behaviors. This serious offence violates the victim’s autonomy and integrity, triggering significant legal and social consequences for the perpetrator.
Spousal Abuse
“Spousal Abuse” encompasses a range of abusive behaviors within intimate relationships, including physical, emotional, financial, and psychological harm. This form of abuse undermines the victim’s safety, dignity, and freedom, demanding urgent and effective legal intervention.
Stay of Proceedings
A “Stay of Proceedings” occurs when the prosecution temporarily halts or permanently discontinues charges against an accused. While the charges can potentially be reactivated within specific timeframes, a stay often ends the immediate legal action against the individual.
Subpoena
A “Subpoena” is a legal document that orders an individual to appear in court to testify or present evidence. Non-compliance with a subpoena can result in legal penalties, underscoring the importance of judicial processes in the pursuit of justice.
Summons
A “Summons” is an official notice directing an individual to appear in court at a specified time and place. It serves as a formal mechanism to engage parties in legal proceedings, whether as defendants, witnesses, or in other capacities.
Surety
A “Surety” is a person who agrees to be responsible for the debt, default, or misconduct of another. In the context of bail, a surety pledges a certain amount of money as a guarantee that the accused will comply with the conditions of their release and appear in court as required.